Category Archives: Movie Review
Natalie Portman is Under Fire
Natalie Portman thrilled and frightened audiences as the downward spiraling ballerina “Nina” in the Black Swan. She won an Oscar for that performance — but now, critics are asking how much dancing she really did.
“According to published reports, Natalie Portman is insisting she did the majority of her dance sequences in the film. This comes after her ballet double Sarah Lane claims Portman did 5 percent of those scenes and there is an allusion that Portman is some sort of dance prodigy, she says. Portman says that Lane was only used for the most complicated dance sequences.” (WDIV)
But that double — real American Ballet Theater dancer Sarah Lane — was never acknowledged for her dance work. In the film’s credits, she’s simply listed as “hand model,” “stunt double,” and as an extra. The Editor in Chief of Dance Magazine is outraged over Lane’s exclusion:
“Do people really believe that it takes only one year to make a ballerina? … I think there has been a propaganda of omissions in the media that has reinforced that belief.”
But team Portman was quick on the defense. And one member of her camp was particularly incensed by the accusation — that report comes from E! News:
“Natalie’s fiance, Benjamin Millepied is defending amid criticism. Her baby daddy — who pulls double duty as her costar and the film’s choreographer — cleared the air for the haters in the LA Times — quote — ‘There are articles now talking about her dance double… Honestly, 85% of that movie is Natalie. It was so believable, it was fantastic, that beautiful movement quality.’”
Lane remained mostly quiet until now under the instruction of the film’s rep — Fox Searchlight. After learning she was hushed… the Wall Street Journal questions the motives behind Portman’s whole Oscar campaign:
“One charge that Sarah Lane made was that she said — Fox Searchlight said stop giving interviews during the Oscar campaign. Talk AFTER she’s won the Oscar. That would suggest that they thought, that if people knew she wasn’t doing all the dancing — they might not give her credit for this terrific performance, that it might take a little bit away from her.”
For the record — Portman did admit she had some help on the advanced dance moves. FasterTimes says — Lane needs to give it a rest:
“But no one gets rewarded for asking for recognition, or fair pay… Indeed, squeaky-Sarah will almost certainly not be hired to ‘hand-model’ for another big studio film any time soon.”
Finally, Business Insider says — either way — this scandal is good for all parties involved.
Portman already has her Oscar, Lane gets her 15 minutes of fame, and of course, the movie:
“The most unsurprising benefit: all of this chatter throws some spotlight back to the movie, which still lingers in a few theaters and comes out on DVD Tuesday.”
So who do you think deserves the credit in these scenes, Portman or Lane? And since nobody really knows who’s dancing — How about the visual effects editors? After all, they’re the geniuses behind this:
(Video: Youtube)
Megan Fox has left Transformers
Call it a hiccup. A mistake. Even karma. Any way you cut it, some critics think Megan Fox’s career might be coming to an end.
Fox’s latest flick, Passion Play – in which she plays a bird woman in a carnival attraction - is bypassing movie theaters – and heading straight-to-DVD. (Annapurna Productions)
After accusing Transformer’s director Michael Bay of sexual harassment and comparing him to Hitler, Fox left the mega-hit franchise. A writer for Pop Crunch argues, maybe Fox was never that big of a box-office draw.
“This is the latest blow to Megan’s acting career… Jennifer’s Body which was released in 2009 debuted at a disappointing number five and only earned $6.8 million. [And] Jonah Hex, released last summer, earned Meg a 2011 Razzie nomination for Worst Actress!”
So maybe her last few movies bombed- but hey, at least they made it to the theater. As her latest flick Passion Play hangs out at a DVD packaging plant- a blogger for The Huffington Post writes…
“Neither angel wings nor cleavage could save Megan Fox’s newest film …Playing at the Toronto Film Festival in September, the film bombed, with terrible reviews and viewers openly mocking it as it played — that is, before they walked out.”
The ex-Transformer chick tells Reelz Channel, this is her best movie yet. MSN says…if that’s true…yikes.
“Variety called it ‘perversely eccentric and frequently inert,’ while the Los Angeles Times said of the … premiere, ‘For most everyone in the room, it felt like it couldn’t be over soon enough.’ But the Hollywood Reporter found some redeeming qualities, including how Fox ‘disrobes attractively’ and acts ‘persuasively shy and hurt, using a soft and whispery voice.’”
And E! Online’s Ted Casablanca adds- maybe Fox should take a step back and reevaluate her career before she takes on another project.
“…maybe the insanely hot chick should just stick to posing in her Armani underwear instead of acting on the big screen. Who would have thought hubby Brian Austin Green had the hot career this year on friggin’ Desperate Housewives?!”
Fox joins a long list of big names with straight-to-DVD stints, including Michelle Pfeiffer, Renee Zellweger and Forrest Whitaker. So is her career DOA? Or can she make a comeback?
Disney’s ‘Mars Needs Moms’ Bombed
Looks like Mars needs more than moms to save itself at the box office.
The kid flick opened over the weekend – and made it into the record book with the 10th worst opening since 1982. It raked in $6.2 million – a far cry from its $150 million dollar production budget. (Video: YouTube/Disney)
So where did Mars go wrong? Some critics are saying that the word “Mom” in the title kept boys away. Hollywood Reporter quotes one studio exec who jokes…
“The title shouldn’t have been Mars Needs Moms, but Boys Need Not Come,”
BoxOffice Mojo argues- the film was doomed from the get-go.
“Mars was severely limited by its premise, which was better suited to a television cartoon, and its execution looked awkward, incoherent and creepy in the marketing.”
The movie’s director Robert Zemeckis’s – whose foray into animation also includes The Polar Express and 2009’s remake of A Christmas Carol – is known for his use of motion capture- tracking points on a moving face or body. A Zoiks blogger says- that’s a lot of extra- unnecessary- work.
“Zemeckis’s insistence on Motion Capture was likely the death knell for ‘Mars Needs Moms,’ a modest story that needed a more modest production if it needed to be made at all.”
Though animation has been one of Hollywood’s biggest money makers for the past decade – The New York Times believes Mars’ box office failure could be hinting at something….
“As the first big-budget computer animated movie to flop, ‘Mars Needs Moms’ tells some film executives that the market is becoming saturated. “
According to Hollywood Reporter, when production and marketing costs are combined, Disney has invested more than $200 million in Mars Needs Moms.
The Avatar Stone
How can I link my weight loss of 8 stone to the concepts in the film Avatar?
I think the inherent interest in this phrase “The Avatar Stone” gives a very specific vibration.
There is truth within the film that we need to embrace in real life – when we do we have found the “The Avatar Stone” and with it comes automatic cleansing within our bodies, when we embrace our Mother, Nature.
This is what I have experienced, Nature is our guide for correct living, if it can be accepted that there is a single solution to most of the complexities we have explored, the link back to this truth is very important.
What does it mean to look good, when you look at the food you eat and can’t feel good about where it comes from?
It means the look you desire has disconnected from the root desire that is far deeper than looking good.
It means you have found a depth of interest within your own self!
You can automatically assume that if you feel some thing is important, and then you have the thing in your hands and it felt better wanting it rather than having it, it means the supply and demand is out of balance.
You CAN feel as good as you feel in your dreams, YOU CAN BE THE ANSWER.
My challenge to you is CAN YOU be brave enough to ask the TRUE QUESTION?
Your body and mind will re-align with your attention to this idea, weight loss will be inevitable.
There is a perfect place in all of us, and the more we run to it, the more momentum we throw into the vacuum of perfect health.
The Avatar Stone is The TRUTH we need to see in the mirror.
The word Avatar, if investigated will trigger interest back into the balance, and it will flush out some of the common confusions with the amount of responsibility our individual lives need to take.
The flip-side of the coin is that only if we choose to be ONE, can we see the illusion of divided power.
Babies
Producer Alain Chabat describes the documentary Babies as a “wildlife film on human babies”. This may sound like an idea that has already been done, but the documentary is actually more original than you might think.
Most non-fiction cinematic chronicles of the under-two set tend to fall into two categories: 1) advice-oriented instructional movies that seek to provide nervous moms and dads with all the information they need to raise a well-adjusted child and 2) YouTube videos featuring said child spitting up, rolling over, falling down or simply staring wide-eyed into the camera.
So the notion of a filmmaker setting a camera down and observing babies in their natural habitat the same way they would a lion, tiger or bear is an intriguing one. And in fact, the resulting documentary does share some similarities with the kinds of traditional nature docs that air in near constant rotation on Animal Planet and the Discovery Channel.
As in those programs, director Thomas Balmès and his camera crew avoid any direct interaction with the wildlife cavorting in front of the camera, which in this case are the four infants—Ponijao from Namibia, Mari from Japan, Hattie from San Francisco and Bayarjargal from Mongolia—who make up the film’s multi-ethnic cast. The babies are also at the center of virtually every shot, meaning that we, the audience don’t see much of their world beyond their tiny frames.



